First time shooting this in MF and am very impressed. Less contrasty than I’d expected which is great, found scanning it on imacon easier to get results compared to Portra. Base is quite thin so can curl easily. I’m a fan and intend to shoot a ton more 👍🏼

Just sent my rolls and got them developed within the reasonable period of time. No hassle, great quality!

The whole process from start to finish was polished and professional. Paying for postage and recieving a royal mail return label to send my package to Stuck in Film was a nice touch and saved spending extra on postage. I received my film in a reasonable time, developed competently, with no scratches on the film.

Looking forward to using this service again.

I was very pleases with the test results from this film.
Very contrasty and clean images, however the dynamic range is not a strength here.
A great value for money nonetheless.

Half frames came out so nice.

Shot this roll in pembrokeshire coastal path, with ilford ilfosol 3 and ilford rapid fixer. results are very good. negaitve roll limited curlling and a sturdy negative to work with. would i use this stock again, Yes

This is really a blast from the past. Harman's two fingers to digital mediocrity. Love it.

Have completed one roll of potsdam, pleased with the resulting shots. Home developed the film. No problems. Have my second roll waiting to be used. Liking the stock and will buy more.

Fits my camera really well and gives the exact same great results as it has done for the past 34 years….

The greatest film since Kodachrome!!!

Perfect delivery in good condition!

Great service overall! From buying the film developing, posting the film via the RM self service and getting the results back, digital and negatives - I can only say that it has been a breeze to navigate and the development has also been great. Will use again in the future!

Great service and quick, I found some rolls of used film at the back of a cupboard of mine, sent them off and the memories were sent back! I chose the develop only as I it was the cheapest option for the old film. I have bought film from these guy’s and love the variety and service they provide.

Film choice is as subjective as trying to define 'love'. It is infinitely subjective, overflowing with nuances and personal preferences. Within the preceeding context, other variables are also at play, such as the lens and chemistry used in conjunction with the film and, of course, the cost.
For four decades, Kodak Tri-X has been my first choice B+W film, mainly because of its deep blacks, higher contrast and obvious grain structure. When I couldn't get Tri-X, Ilford HP5 was my second choice.
The second choice in this case wasn't second place; Ilford HP5 is just different, but different in a compelling way. Ilford HP5 tends to be less contrasty [but 'even' and retains detail in blacks and highlights] and has finer grain, even when pushed from 1600 to 3200.
Now, in 2024, because Kodak Tri-X is mostly more expensive than Ilford HP5, [ HP5] <<< is my first choice.
In summary, both Kodak Tri-X and Ilford HP5 excel at recording images on film, just in different ways.

I haven't shot a roll yet but delivery was excellent.